Table 2 Conventional CMR results.
CA N = 30 | HCM N = 20 | Control N = 15 | p-value CA vs. HCM | p-value CA vs. control | p-value HCM vs. control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LV-EF, % | 55 (± 9) | 65 (± 7) | 61 (± 6) | < 0.001 | 0.05 | 0.72 |
LV-EDV index, ml/m2 | 83 (± 16) | 72 (± 14) | 83 (± 12) | 0.040 | 1.00 | 0.10 |
LV-ESV index, ml/m2 | 38 (± 11) | 26 (± 8) | 34 (± 9) | < 0.001 | 0.41 | 0.10 |
LV mass index, g/m2 | 93 (85–108) | 81 (62–99) | 55 (51–60) | 0.25 | < 0.001 | 0.001 |
Max. LV wall thickness, mm | 18 (16–21) | 17 (15–26) | 9 (8–10) | 1.0 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
RV-EF, % | 54 (± 10) | 65 (± 8) | 57 (± 8) | 0.001 | 1.0 | 0.045 |
RV-EDV index, ml/m2 | 79 (66–94) | 64 (57–82) | 82 (69–91) | 0.028 | 1.0 | 0.012 |
RV-ESV index, ml/m2 | 36 (± 12) | 25 (± 10) | 37 (± 11) | 0.002 | 1.0 | 0.010 |
LGE QALE score, n | 9 (6–12) | 2 (0–5) | 0 (0) | 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.001 |
