Table 3 The analysis of deviance table (Type II) for the binomial GLMM shows that the effect of pair formation on the correct assignment of calls to individuals, was call type specific. Significant (highest-order) effects are indicated with p-values in bold.

From: Trade-offs between vocal accommodation and individual recognisability in common marmoset vocalizations

Response: correctly classified calls

 

Chi2

df

p

Condition [(bpf) vs. (apf)]

7.36

1

0.007

Call type

26.03

2

2.224e−06

Condition × call type

63.58

2

1.559e−14

  1. pseudo-R2 = 0.25, Nobservations = 106 on NIndividuals = 20,in NPairs = 10; NCall types = 3.
Back to article page