Table 2 Comparisons between groups in UG rounds and in HRV measurements.
From: Explicit and implicit markers of fairness preeminence in criminal judges
Criminal judges (mean, SD) | Controls (mean, SD) | Judges vs. controls (p value) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Heart rate variability measurement before UG (resting HRV) | |||
RMSSD | 16,739 (3988) | 75,096 (3548) | < 0.05 |
Ultimatum game measures | |||
Rate of rejection of unfair offers in individual rounds | 0.46 (0.26) | 0.39 (0.23) | 0.32 |
Reaction times in individual rounds with unfair offers | 5932.22 (4189.2) | 4061.62 (2844.22) | 0.066 |
Rate of rejection of unfair offers in comparative rounds | 0.78 (0.20) | 0.54 (0.40) | < 0.01 |
Reaction time in comparative rounds with unfair offers | 6382.21 (4480.3) | 4103.31 (3046.12) | < 0.05 |
Rate of acceptance of fair offers in Individual rounds | 0.515 (0.20) | 0.641 (0.27) | 0.17 |
Reaction times in individual rounds with fair offers | 6520.11 (4048.91) | 3869.2 (2044.40) | 0.011 |
Rate of acceptance of fair offers in comparative rounds | 0.719 (0.20) | 0.756 (.40) | 0.53 |
Reaction time in comparative rounds with fair offers | 5709.11 (4792.12) | 4033.84 (4386.01) | 0.45 |
