Table 2 Energy expenditure (EE) estimates from three devices compared with indirect calorimetry (IC) in the optimization cohort 1. Mean absolute percentages error (MAPE) percentages, paired sample t test statistics and intraclass correlation (ICC) statistics with 95% CI presented for each device for total 20 min of testing. *Shows statistical significance.
MAPE-% ± Std. dev. | Paired samples t test | 95% Confidence interval of the difference | ICC | 95% Confidence interval | F test | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± Std. dev. | Lower | Upper | Sig. (2-tailed) | Lower | Upper | Value | Sig. | |||
Sartorio | 30.324 ± 16.360 | − 1.337 ± 0.678 | − 1.590 | − 1.084 | 0.000* | 0.209 | − 0.663 | 0.623 | 1.264 | 0.266 |
ActivPAL | 20.545 ± 10.766 | 1.239 ± 1.134 | 0.827 | 1.655 | 0.000* | 0.175 | − 0.712 | 0.602 | 1.211 | 0.301 |
ActiGraph | 24.319 ± 9.596 | 1.186 ± 0.680 | 0.917 | 1.455 | 0.000* | 0.471 | − 0.162 | 0.759 | 1.889 | 0.056 |
