Table 2 Association between Vitamin D and COVID-19 risk in multivariable regression models.
From: An observational and Mendelian randomisation study on vitamin D and COVID-19 risk in UK Biobank
COVID positive (N = 1746) vs controls (N = 415,596) | COVID hospitalization (N = 1020) vs non- hospitalization (N = 576) cases | COVID death (N = 399) vs non-death (N = 1347) cases | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | p-val | OR (95% CI) | p-val | OR (95% CI) | p-val | |
vitD (nmol/l)a | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.593 | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.506 | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.356 |
vitD_May_adjusted (nmol/l)a | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.592 | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.674 | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.324 |
vitD_categoricala | ||||||
0–25 nmol/L | Ref | – | Ref | – | Ref | – |
25–50 nmol/L | 1.03 (0.87–1.20) | 0.743 | 0.94 (0.64–1.39) | 0.759 | 0.93 (0.57–1.52) | 0.774 |
50 nmol/L | 0.97 (0.81–1.16) | 0.762 | 0.90 (0.63–1.28) | 0.551 | 0.92 (0.54–1.56) | 0.757 |
vitD-wGRS134b | 0.91 (0.80–1.03) | 0.134 | 1.05 (0.81–1.36) | 0.721 | 1.25 (0.90–1.73) | 0.175 |
vitD-UVB | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.557 | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) | < 2 × 10–16 | 0.97 (0.96–0.98) | < 2 × 10–16 |
vitD-wGRS134 + vitD-UVBc | ||||||
vitD-wGRS134 | 0.92 (0.81–1.04) | 0.191 | 0.88 (0.66–1.17) | 0.391 | 1.12 (0.80–1.57) | 0.508 |
vitD-UVB | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.511 | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) | < 2 × 10–16 | 0.97 (0.96–0.98) | 4.35 × 10–16 |