Table 2 DSEM results of the short-term effects of social media use with friends (SMU) on friendship closeness (FCL) based on the ESM assesments.
| Â | Model 1.1 (baseline model) | Model 1.2 (H1 & H2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | β | p | 95% CI | b | β | p | 95% CI | |
Fixed effects | ||||||||
Within-Person | ||||||||
FCLt−1→ FCLt(AR_FCL) | 0.263 | .263 | .000 | [.249, .276] | 0.263 | .263 | .000 | [.250, .277] |
SMUt* → FCL t (ST_SMI_FCL) | −0.160 | −.041 | .000 | [−.053, −.029] | −0.160 | −.041 | .000 | [−.053, −.029] |
Between-Person | ||||||||
SMU & FCL | 0.043 | .125 | .010 | [.024, .227] | 0.036 | .110 | .018 | [.007, .213] |
LON & FS |  |  |  |  | −0.113 | −.232 | .000 | [−.324, −.134] |
FS → ST_SMI_FCL (H1a vs. H1b) |  |  |  |  | −0.059 | −.063 | .166 | [−.189, .061] |
LON → ST_SMI_FCL (H2a vs. H2b) |  |  |  |  | 0.109 | .139 | .022 | [.004, .264] |
FS → FCL |  |  |  |  | 0.363 | .176 | .000 | [.075, .271] |
LON → FCL |  |  |  |  | −0.292 | −.169 | .001 | [−.268, −.068] |
FS → SMU |  |  |  |  | 0.037 | .091 | .045 | [−.013, .195] |
LON → SMU |  |  |  |  | 0.002 | .006 | .459 | [−.100, .109] |
| Â | Model 1.1 (baseline model) | Model 1.2 (H1 & H2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
σ2 | p | 95% CI | σ2 | p | 95% CI | |||
Variance (Random Effects) | ||||||||
Within-Person | ||||||||
FCL | 1.977 | .000 | [1.947, 2.008] | 1.977 | .000 | [1.947, 2.008] | ||
R2 FCL | 0.127 | .000 | [0.119, 0.135] | 0.127 | .000 | [0.120, 0.135] | ||
Between-Person | ||||||||
FCL | 1.730 | .000 | [1.498, 2.015] | 1.609 | .000 | [1.399, 1.869] | ||
ST_SMI_FCL | 0.354 | .000 | [0.277, 0.448] | 0.346 | .000 | [0.274, 0.437] | ||
AR_FCL | 0.034 | .000 | [0.028, 0.041] | 0.033 | .000 | [0.027, 0.041] | ||
R2 ST_SMI_FCL | Â | Â | Â | 0.032 | .000 | [0.004, 0.086] | ||
R2 FCL | Â | Â | Â | 0.076 | .000 | [0.031, 0.135] | ||
R2 SMU | Â | Â | Â | 0.011 | .000 | [0.001, 0.040] | ||