Table 4 Results of subgroup-analyses of dietary Ca intake in relation to T2DM/hyperglycemia in cross-sectional studies.

From: Dietary calcium intake in relation to type-2 diabetes and hyperglycemia in adults: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies

 

No. of effect sizes

OR (95% CI)

P within1

I2 (%)

P between2

Overall

11

0.88 (0.73, 1.06)

0.00

69.5

 

Representativeness of population

   

0.25

 

Representative

7

0.93 (0.77, 1.11)

0.05

51.0

 

Non-representative

4

0.59 (0.25, 1.35)

 < 0.001

84.4

 

Questionnaire

    

0.00

FFQ

7

0.92 (0.76, 1.10)

0.01

61.9

 

Recall

3

1.07 (0.81, 1.43)

0.35

3.7

 

Record

1

0.43 (0.28, 0.66)

-

-

 

Outcome

    

0.45

T2D

3

1.07 ( 0.81, 1.43)

0.35

3.7

 

High blood glucose (HBG)

8

0.83 (0.66, 1.04)

 < 0.001

76.8

 

Health status of participants

   

0.00

 

Healthy

8

0.82 (0.64, 1.04)

0.00

69.0

 

Un healthy

3

1.07 (0.96, 1.19)

0.43

0.0

 

Mean age

    

0.28

 < 50

6

0.82 (0.53, 1.27)

0.00

70.9

 

 ≥ 50

5

0.90 (0.73, 1.11)

0.00

72.5

 

Asian vs. Non-Asian counties

   

0.00

 

Asian

6

0.79 (0.61, 1.04)

0.00

74.8

 

Non-Asian

5

1.07 (0.97, 1.18)

0.54

0.0

 

Development status of study location

  

0.01

  

Developed

8

0.86 (0.68, 1.07)

0.00

70.3

 

Developing

3

0.71 (0.23, 2.21)

0.26

25.1

 

Quality score3

    

0.23

Low quality (Scores ≤ 7)

3

0.62 (0.26, 1.50)

 < 0.001

89.1

 

High quality (Scores > 7)

8

0.92 (0.77, 1.10)

0.07

46.4

 
  1. 1P for heterogeneity, within subgroup.
  2. 2P for heterogeneity, between subgroups.
  3. 3Quality Scores were according to Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.