Table 4 Mean ratings on each item of the System Usability Scale in occupational therapists and patients with stroke.
Occupational therapists (n = 4) | Patients with stroke (n = 10) | |
|---|---|---|
1. I think that I would like to use this system frequently | 3.25 ± 1.50 (Range: 1–4) | 3.70 ± 0.48 (Range: 3–4) |
2. I found the system unnecessarily complex | 3.00 ± 0.82 (Range: 2–4) | 3.30 ± 0.95 (Range: 1–4) |
3. I thought the system was easy to use | 3.50 ± 0.58 (Range: 3–4) | 3.70 ± 0.67 (Range: 2–4) |
4. I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system | 2.50 ± 0.58 (Range: 2–3) | 2.00 ± 1.25 (Range: 1–4) |
5. I found the various functions in this system were well integrated | 3.25 ± 0.50 (Range: 3–4) | 3.30 ± 0.82 (Range: 2–4) |
6. I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system | 3.25 ± 0.50 (Range: 3–4) | 3.50 ± 0.53 (Range: 3–4) |
7. I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly | 3.25 ± 0.50 (Range: 3–4) | 3.10 ± 0.99 (Range: 1–4) |
8. I found the system very cumbersome to use | 3.25 ± 0.96 (Range: 2–4) | 3.20 ± 1.23 (Range: 0–4) |
9. I felt very confident using the system | 3.75 ± 0.50 (Range: 3–4) | 3.50 ± 0.71 (Range: 2–4) |
10. I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system | 2.75 ± 1.26 (Range: 1–4) | 2.70 ± 1.57 (Range: 0–4) |
