Table 4 Results of cognitive performances.

From: Multimodal investigation of the association between shift work and the brain in a population-based sample of older adults

Compared to

RANDOM

MATCHED

Linear regression of shift work years

Sign (%)

Mean rank MATCHED/PRESENT

Effect size r

ß

CI lower; upper

p

η2

PRESENT shift workers

 

AKT (Time)

3.1

12.62/13.42, p = .810

.05

− .315

− .585; .169

.233

.195

CBT (Forward)

2.3

14.42/12.58, p = .139

− .13

− .298

− .070; .023

.271

.149

CBT (Backward)

3.5

12.65/14.35, p = .579

.12

.611

− .005; .072

.280

.474

ZNS (Forward)

2.2

13.69/13.31, p = .920

− .03

.044

− .044; .049

.900

.002

ZNS(Backward)

3.1

12.77/14.23, p = .650

.12

− .141

− .066; .044

.648

.027

TMTA

4.6

16.50/ 10.50, p = .044

− .39

.046

− .436; .489

.899

.002

TMTB

2.9

17.60/13.40; p = .202

.24

.415

− .160; .991

.137

.228

TMTBA(Switch)

2.8

11.46/15.54, p = .186

.27

.286

− .990; 2.372

.371

.101

Stroop(Reading)

2.7

12.31/14.69, p = 0.448

.16

.086

− .572; .700

.822

.007

Stroop(Naming)

4.5

11.96/15.04, p = .311

.20

− .098

− .593; .769

.774

.001

Stroop(Selectivity)

3.2

14.15/12.85, p = .687

− .09

.424

− .362; 1.403

.211

.188

Stroop(Interference)

3.2

16.62/10.38, p = .039

− .41

.442

− .310; 1.222

.207

.191

Reasoning

3.4

11.23/15.77, p = .139

.30

.032

− .340; .371

.921

.001

Visual Pattern

2.6

13.65/13.35, p = .92

− .03

.020

− .090; .095

.950

.001

Benton

3.1

12.50/14.5, p = 0511

.13

.120

− .410; .594

.684

.022

Creative Think

2.3

13.23/13.77, p = .880

.04

.230

− .235; .292

.538

.055

Vocabulary

3.5

11.42/14.71, p = .270

. 22

− .041

− .276; .244

.888

.049

FORMER shift workers

AKT (Time)

4.1

83.45/93.44, p = .193

.10

.214

.019; .556

.036

.045

CBT (Forward)

4.0

90.95/86.11, p = .497

− .04

− .002

− .018; .018

.987

.001

CBT (Backward)

3.4

90.06/86.97, p = .674

− .02

− .065

− .031; .016

.537

.005

ZNS (Forward)

4.8

93.99/83.13, p = .139

− .07

− .060

− .027; .015

.575

.004

ZNS (Backward)

5.5

86.43/90.53, p = .549

.05

.003

− .020; .021

.977

.001

TMTA

4.3

92.57/84.52, p = .295

− .07

.084

− .133; .332

.397

.009

TMTB

5.0

98.37/102.64; p = .602

− .04

.214

− .040; .469

.098

.029

TMTBA(Switch)

5.7

88.34/88.66, p = .967

− .01

.141

− .293; 1.629

.170

.022

Stroop(Reading)

4.3

80.53/96.29; p = .040

.16

.180

− .018; .272

.084

.035

Stroop(Naming)

5.6

80.49/96.33, p = .039

.13

.234

.023; .450

.031

.065

Stroop(Selectivity)

3.4

86.11/90.84, p = .538

.03

.202

.007; 1.316

.048

.052

Stroop(Interference)

3.3

90.19/86.85, p = .664

.00

.180

− .069; 1.137

.082

.040

Reasoning

4.3

87.14/88.85, p = .823

.00

− .221

− .198; − .022

.015

.063

Visual Pattern

4.2

92.45/84.63, p = .301

− .05

− .076

− .046; .021

.526

.007

Benton

4.1

89.41/84.56, p = .524

− .05

.047

− .120; .203

.612

.003

Creative Think

4.0

90.30/85.72, p = .549

.01

− .127

− .276; .072

.247

.018

Vocabulary

3.4

80.53/96.29; p = .446

− .03

− .177

− .190; − .010

.076

.039

  1. Sign. = Percentage of tests that showed a significance of p < 0.05 when comparing PRESENT or FORMER shift workers with 1000 samples of RANDOM controls. * indicates an asymptotic significance. CI = 95% confidence interval.