Table 6 Post-hoc analyses, subtest × index—within-subject comparisons. Paired comparisons between subtests within each group.

From: Cognitive profiles in children and adolescents with Down syndrome

 

Within-subject comparison

Verbal profile

Non-verbal profile

Homogeneous profile

Receptive Vocabulary

Picture Naming

t = −0.50

p = 0.62

d = 0.06

BF10 = 0.22

t = 1.11

p = 0.28

d = 0.14

BF10 = 0.39

t = −0.77

p = 0.45

d = 0.08

BF10 = 0.30

Information

t = −0.36

p = 0.72

d = 0.05

BF10 = 0.21

t = 0.99

p = 0.33

d = 0.13

BF10 = 0.36

t = −0.78

p = 0.44

d = 0.08

BF10 = 0.30

Block Design

t = 2.48

p = 0.02

d = 0.36

BF10 = 2.60

t = −1.76

p = 0.09

d = 0.25

BF10 = 0.83

t = −1.36

p = 0.19

d = 0.16

BF10 = 0.51

Object Assembly

t = 4.32

p < .001

d = 0.48

BF10 = 1.56 × 102

t = −3.62

p = 0.001

d = 0.45

BF10 = 23.74

t = −0.81

p = 0.43

d = 0.10

BF10 = 0.30

Picture Naming

Information

t = 0.10

p = 0.92

d = 0.01

BF10 = 0.20

t = −0.13

p = 0.90

d = 0.01

BF10 = 0.22

t = 0.005

p = 1.00

d = 0.001

BF10 = 0.23

Block Design

t = 3.59

p = 0.001

d = 0.42

BF10 = 27.41

t = −2.55

p = 0.02

d = 0.39

BF10 = 2.97

t = −1.03

p = 0.31

d = 0.08

BF10 = 0.36

Object Assembly

t = 4.52

p < .001

d = 0.54

BF10 = 2.55 × 102

t = −5.39

p < .001

d = 0.60

BF10 = 9.96 × 102

t = −0.23

p = 0.82

d = 0.02

BF10 = 0.24

Information

Block Design

t = 3.26

p = 0.003

d = 0.41

BF10 = 13.19

t = −2.82

p = 0.01

d = 0.39

BF10 = 4.89

t = −0.61

p = 0.55

d = 0.06

BF10 = 0.27

Object Assembly

t = 4.79

p < .001

d = 0.53

BF10 = 4.97 × 102

t = −4.53

p < .001

d = 1.46

BF10 = 1.61 × 102

t = −0.21

p = 0.83

d = 0.02

BF10 = 0.23

Block design

Object Assembly

t = 1.17

p = 0.25

d = 0.11

BF10 = 0.36

t = −2.24

p = 0.04

d = 0.21

BF10 = 1.73

t = 0.59

p = 0.56

d = 0.06

BF10 = 0.27

  1. t t-test value; p significance level; d Cohen’s d expressing the effect size; BF10 Bayes factor expressing the probability of the data given H1 relative to H0.