Table 1 CNN2 performance assessment.
From: Machine learning outperforms clinical experts in classification of hip fractures
| Â | Actual | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
No fracture | Trochanteric | Intracapsular | ||
Predicted | ||||
No fracture | 304 | 12 | 13 | 329 |
Trochanteric | 1 | 169 | 6 | 176 |
Intracapsular | 15 | 14 | 198 | 227 |
Total | 320 | 195 | 217 | Â |
Precision | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.87 | Â |
95% CI | 0.89 to 0.95 | 0.92 to 0.98 | 0.82 to 0.91 | Â |
Recall | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.91 | Â |
95% CI | 0.92 to 0.97 | 0.81 to 0.91 | 0.87 to 0.95 | Â |
F1 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.89 | Â |