Table 1 Within- and between person effects of different interactions regarding different aspects of daily empathy and age predicting daily prosocial behavior.

From: Investigating adult age differences in real-life empathy, prosociality, and well-being using experience sampling

Interaction term predicting prosocial behavior

Within-subject effects

Between-subject effects

t or z-score

Adj. p value

Estimate (SE)

Effect size (r)

t or z-score

Adj. p value

Estimate (SE)

Effect size (r)

Empathy opportunity * age group

− 2.8

0.024*

0.05

− 0.04

− 1.9

0.406

0.2

− 0.1

Empathy opportunity *age group2

2.72

0.024*

0.06

0.04

    

Target of empathy* age group

1.12

0.351

0.04

0.01

− 0.94

0.819

0.32

− 0.08

Empathy* age group

1.13

0.351

0.09

0.03

0.03

0.978

0.31

0

Emotion share* age group

− 1.43

0.308

0.11

− 0.04

0.81

0.819

0.33

0.07

Perspective take* age group

− 1.72

0.227

0.11

− 0.05

0.52

0.844

0.32

0.05

Compassion* age group

0.42

0.674

0.15

0.02

0.25

0.94

0.41

0.03

Interaction term predicting prosocial behavior

Chi2

Adj. p-value

  

Chi2

Adj. p-value

  

Valenceα*age groupβ

0.2

0.674

  

0.53

0.819

  
  1. Prosocial behavior was included in all models as binary outcome variable. Statistics obtained from mixed models, nested within participant and survey day. Each interaction ran in a separate model, with age as linear and quadratic term separately. Model selection was conducted based on a loglikelihood ratio test. P values were adjusted to control the false discovery rate. *p < 0.05.
  2. αPositive, negative, or neutral target emotion.
  3. βReduced random effect structure due to convergence warnings, only nested within participant.