Table 9 Comparison of fusion methods.
Tunnel section | Evaluation model | Probability over Class I | Probability over Class II | Probability over Class III | Probability over Class IV | Predicted label | True label |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No.1 | E1 | 0.14 | 0.6 | 0.18 | 0.08 | II | II |
E2 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.00 | III | II | |
E3 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | I | II | |
Fusion | Improve | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0.00 | II | II |
Traditonal | 0.65 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | I | II | |
No.2 | E1 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.94 | 0.02 | III | III |
E2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.07 | III | III | |
E3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | III | III | |
Fusion | Improve | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | III | III |
Traditonal | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | III | III | |
No.3 | E1 | 0.04 | 0.91 | 0.03 | 0.01 | II | II |
E2 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.30 | 0.00 | II | II | |
E3 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | II | II | |
Fusion | Improve | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | II | II |
Traditonal | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | II | II | |
No.4 | E1 | 0.64 | 0.30 | 0.06 | 0.00 | I | II |
E2 | 0.00 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.00 | II | II | |
E3 | 0.00 | 0.95 | 0.05 | 0.00 | II | II | |
Fusion | Improve | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | II | II |
Traditonal | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | II | II | |
No.12 | E1 | 0.01 | 0.93 | 0.01 | 0.05 | II | III |
E2 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.83 | 0.17 | III | III | |
E3 | 0.00 | 0.64 | 0.36 | 0.00 | II | III | |
Fusion | Improve | 0.00 | 0.35 | 0.64 | 0.01 | III | III |
Traditonal | 0.10 | 0.90 | 0.10 | 0.00 | II | III |
