Table 2 Comparison of maximum adsorption capacities for heavy metals on some adsorbents.

From: Waste tea residue adsorption coupled with electrocoagulation for improvement of copper and nickel ions removal from simulated wastewater

Biomass/waste name

Activated agent

Created as adsorbent

Adsorbate

Max.adsorption capacity (mg g−1)

References

Green waste tea residue

No any activating agent

Without activation

Cu2+ and Ni2+

15.6 and 15.9

Present work

Sewage sludge

ZnCl2

Activated

Cu, Zn, and Al

15.58, 24.09 and 27.70

68

Bamboo

SM1

SM2

No any activating agent

Activated

Cu(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II)

0.4, 0.17 and 0.40

0.4, 0.25 and 0.39

69

Pistachio shell

Fe3O4 NPs@AC@SO3H

Activated

Pb(II), As(III) and Cd(III)

147.05, 151.51 and 119.04

70

Sugarcane

ZnCl2

activated

Cu2+, Ni2+ and Pb2+

2.99, 13.24 and 19.3

71

Coconut shell

H3PO4

Activated

Cd(II)

33.71

72

Vegetable wastes

H2SO4, H3PO4 and NH4NO3

Activated

Cd2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+

4.97, 3.29 and 3.07

73

Sand

α-Fe2O3

Coated

Cu(II)

3.93

35

Sugarcane Bagasse

H3PO4

Activated

Hg

107.7

74