Table 3 Agreement between 2D CVI (Subfoveal) and 3D CVI (Whole, Superior, Central, and Inferior Macula).
From: Three-dimensional modelling of the choroidal angioarchitecture in a multi-ethnic Asian population
ICC (95% CI) | Bland–Altman | F-test in equality of variance (P)* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
95% Limits of agreement, % | Mean difference, % (95% CI) | |||
2D (Subfoveal) versus 3D (Whole Macula) | 0.591 (0.365, 0.749) | −2.55, 3.76 | 0.61 (0.15, 1.07) | 0.049 |
2D (Subfoveal) versus 3D (Superior Macula) | 0.483 (0.234, 0.671) | −3.11, 4.66 | 0.78 (0.21, 1.34 | 0.600 |
2D (Subfoveal) versus 3D (Central Macula) | 0.719 (0.554, 0.830) | −2.63, 3.00 | 0.18 (−0.22, 0.59) | 0.179 |
2D (Subfoveal) versus 3D (Inferior Macula) | 0.394 (0.134, 0.604) | −3.10, 4.85 | 0.87 (0.30, 1.45) | 0.153 |
