Table 4 Low vs high valence classification accuracies obtained with EEGNet.

From: Two-dimensional CNN-based distinction of human emotions from EEG channels selected by multi-objective evolutionary algorithm

S

Channels

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

1

0.812

0.929

0.933

0.938

0.946

0.975

 

0.992

 

1.000

     

2

0.592

0.721

0.792

0.833

0.871

0.875

0.879

0.908

0.917

      

3

0.733

0.833

0.967

0.975

1.000

          

4

 

0.792

0.825

0.838

0.875

0.9

0.908

 

0.921

  

0.938

 

0.942

 

5

0.558

0.649

0.814

0.86

0.874

0.881

0.909

0.94

       

6

0.698

 

0.827

0.867

0.882

0.933

 

0.941

  

0.976

 

0.980

 

0.984

7

0.564

0.76

0.796

0.911

  

0.964

    

0.978

0.991

 

1.000

8

0.650

0.675

0.717

0.783

0.838

 

0.862

0.912

0.929

0.938

     

9

0.693

0.778

0.818

0.84

 

0.849

0.862

 

0.876

0.884

0.920

    

10

0.589

0.674

0.785

0.800

0.852

  

0.878

 

0.915

 

0.933

 

0.944

 

11

0.644

0.693

0.804

0.844

0.849

0.871

 

0.911

       

12

0.905

0.962

0.981

1.000

           

13

0.922

1.000

             

14

0.615

0.738

0.774

 

0.826

0.831

 

0.856

0.872

0.908

 

0.928

   

15

0.775

0.867

0.898

 

0.916

 

0.94

0.979

       

16

0.800

0.890

0.900

0.910

0.930

 

0.943

 

0.96

0.977

 

0.983

0.997

  

17

0.716

 

0.738

0.751

0.756

 

0.778

  

0.782

0.800

    

18

 

0.791

0.844

0.849

0.88

 

0.893

 

0.907

  

0.924

  

0.929

19

0.554

0.744

0.867

 

0.877

0.913

0.938

0.944

0.954

      

20

0.822

0.904

0.941

0.956

0.978

1.000

         

21

0.633

0.825

0.933

0.958

0.975

 

0.983

 

1.000

      

22

0.684

0.809

0.831

0.858

0.871

0.876

0.889

0.907

0.916

      

23

0.641

0.754

0.81

0.846

0.892

  

0.923

  

0.944

0.969

 

0.974

0.979

24

0.648

0.876

0.914

0.971

 

0.981

1.000

        

25

0.747

0.793

0.847

0.940

0.993

1.000

         

26

0.569

0.725

0.839

0.863

0.914

0.929

0.957

0.984

0.996

      

27

0.692

0.856

0.903

 

0.918

0.949

0.985

0.990

 

0.995

     

28

0.660

0.737

0.787

  

0.803

0.807

0.823

0.903

0.907

    

0.930

29

0.621

0.713

0.774

0.790

0.841

 

0.877

0.985

    

0.995

  

30

0.627

0.740

 

0.777

0.84

 

0.860

0.883

0.940

      

31

0.713

0.760

0.843

 

0.867

0.877

0.917

0.947

 

0.960

  

0.977

  

32

0.772

0.856

0.928

0.967

0.994

1.000

         
  1. Accuracies obtained in the Pareto-front for the first 1-15 channels selected by NSGA-II.
  2. The subjects with the highest accuracies per channel set are indicated in bold.