Table 1 Results from multiple regressions predicting L2 change based on standardized L2 performance before the training, standardized MST leaf fraction before the training and change in MST leaf fraction over the training.

From: Global and localized network characteristics of the resting brain predict and adapt to foreign language learning in older adults

Frequency Band

L2 Measure

 

ΔR2

β

SE β

Bootstrap CI (95%)

p

lower

upper

Alpha

Complexity

 

.547

     

Intercept

 

0.976*

0.166

0.176

0.970

.000

L2 pre-training

 

− 0.815

0.172

− 1.261

− 0.360

.000

Leaf fraction pre-train

 

− 0.148

0.186

− 0.658

0.317

.434

Leaf fraction change

 

0.201

0.182

− 0.116

0.632

.282

Accuracy

 

.122

     

Intercept

 

1.471*

0.093

1.142

1.682

.000

L2 pre-training

 

− 0.119

0.101

− 0.513

0.212

.253

Leaf fraction pre-train

 

− 0.027

0.110

− 0.231

0.196

.811

Leaf fraction change

 

0.091

0.102

− 0.111

0.303

.380

Fluency

 

.118

     

Intercept

 

1.351*

0.117

1.005

1.877

.000

L2 pre-training

 

0.088

0.121

− 0.352

0.622

.476

Leaf fraction pre-train

 

0.128

0.131

− 0.112

0.527

.338

Leaf fraction change

 

0.178

0.127

− 0.026

0.421

.175

Beta

Complexity

 

.583

     

Intercept

 

0.944*

0.162

0.286

0.879

.000

L2 pre-training

 

− 0.792*

0.162

− 1.233

− 0.534

.000

Leaf fraction pre-train

 

0.440*

0.192

0.070

0.994

.032

Leaf fraction change

 

0.241

0.174

− 0.014

0.549

.179

Accuracy

 

.308

     

Intercept

 

1.431*

0.084

1.103

1.611

.000

L2 pre-training

 

− 0.121

0.088

− 0.472

0.133

.183

Leaf fraction pre-train

 

0.222*

0.101

0.017

0.496

.039

Leaf fraction change

 

0.229*

0.091

0.022

0.440

.019

Fluency

 

.206

     

Intercept

 

1.333*

0.113

1.103

1.922

.000

L2 pre-training

 

0.115

0.117

− 0.230

0.848

.337

Leaf fraction pre-train

 

0.295*

0.134

− 0.041

0.687

.039

Leaf fraction change

 

0.164

0.123

− 0.170

0.399

.197

  1. Bootstrapped confidence intervals were calculated on the basis of 2000 bootstrap samples. Coefficients marked * are significant (p < .05), those marked bold are robust in that they do not contain zero in the bootstrapped confidence intervals. None of the reported correlations between L2 development and MST leaf fraction remained significant when FDR correction for multiple comparisons was applied to the p-values of MST predictors.