Table 8 Comparison of qualitative and quantitative variables between rice farming systems.
Clusters | p | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | |||
Qualitative variables | ||||||
Education | Illiterate | 89 (66.9) | 68 (71.6) | 35 (71.4) | 77 (55.4) | 0.018 |
Primary | 25 (18.8) | 21 (22.1) | 10 (20.4) | 28 (20.1) | ||
Secondary | 16 (12.0) | 6 (6.3) | 4 (8.2) | 32 (23.0) | ||
University | 3 (2.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.4) | ||
FH | No | 92 (69.2) | 69 (72.6) | 43 (87.8) | 106 (76.3) | 0.074 |
Yes | 41 (30.8) | 26 (27.4) | 6 (12.2) | 33 (23.7) | ||
FW | No | 23 (17.3) | 4 (4.2) | 6 (12.2) | 45 (32.4) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 110 (82.7) | 91 (95.8) | 43 (87.8) | 94 (67.6) | ||
GE | No | 63 (47.4) | 89 (93.7) | 23 (46.9) | 30 (21.6) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 70 (52.6) | 6 (6.3) | 26 (53.1) | 109 (78.4) | ||
HFL | No | 68 (51.1) | 87 (91.6) | 40 (81.6) | 18 (12.9) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 65 (48.9) | 8 (8.4) | 9 (18.4) | 121 (87.1) | ||
InI | No | 127 (95.5) | 95 (100.0) | 40 (81.6) | 137 (98.6) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 6 (4.5) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (18.4) | 2 (1.4) | ||
Irrigation | No | 128 (96.2) | 95 (100.0) | 30 (61.2) | 109 (78.4) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 5 (3.8) | 0 (0.0) | 19 (38.8) | 30 (21.6) | ||
LO | No | 27 (20.3) | 24 (25.3) | 16 (32.7) | 33 (23.7) | 0.377 |
Yes | 106 (79.7) | 71 (74.7) | 33 (67.3) | 106 (76.3) | ||
AT | No | 133 (100.0) | 95 (100.0) | 6 (12.2) | 139 (100.0) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 43 (87.8) | 0 (0.0) | ||
MA | No | 48 (36.1) | 81 (85.3) | 18 (36.7) | 6 (4.3) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 85 (63.9) | 14 (14.7) | 31 (63.3) | 133 (95.7) | ||
MH | No | 41 (30.8) | 26 (27.4) | 6 (12.2) | 33 (23.7) | 0.074 |
Yes | 92 (69.2) | 69 (72.6) | 43 (87.8) | 106 (76.3) | ||
MO | No | 125 (94.0) | 95 (100.0) | 5 (10.2) | 138 (99.3) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 8 (6.0) | 0 (0.0) | 44 (89.8) | 1 (0.7) | ||
NGOS | No | 109 (82.0) | 95 (100.0) | 44 (89.8) | 89 (64.0) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 24 (18.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (10.2) | 50 (36.0) | ||
OFI | No | 103 (77.4) | 92 (96.8) | 45 (91.8) | 77 (55.4) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 30 (22.6) | 3 (3.2) | 4 (8.2) | 62 (44.6) | ||
OSR | No | 123 (92.5) | 92 (96.8) | 27 (55.1) | 92 (66.2) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 10 (7.5) | 3 (3.2) | 22 (44.9) | 47 (33.8) | ||
RA | No | 11 (8.3) | 27 (28.4) | 3 (6.1) | 9 (6.5) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 122 (91.7) | 68 (71.6) | 46 (93.9) | 130 (93.5) | ||
RMC | No | 65 (48.9) | 54 (56.8) | 36 (73.5) | 16 (11.5) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 68 (51.1) | 41 (43.2) | 13 (26.5) | 123 (88.5) | ||
TRF | No | 36 (27.1) | 87 (91.6) | 16 (32.7) | 3 (2.2) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 97 (72.9) | 8 (8.4) | 33 (67.3) | 136 (97.8) | ||
UF | No | 19 (14.3) | 64 (67.4) | 4 (8.2) | 4 (2.9) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 114 (85.7) | 31 (32.6) | 45 (91.8) | 135 (97.1) | ||
UIV | No | 19 (14.3) | 43 (45.3) | 19 (38.8) | 1 (0.7) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 114 (85.7) | 52 (54.7) | 30 (61.2) | 138 (99.3) | ||
UP | No | 41 (30.8) | 39 (41.1) | 16 (32.7) | 38 (27.3) | 0.169 |
Yes | 92 (69.2) | 56 (58.9) | 33 (67.3) | 101 (72.7) | ||
Quantitative variables | ||||||
Age | Mean (SD) | 45.3 (12.3) | 41.3 (13.0) | 44.0 (12.7) | 44.1 (12.7) | 0.127 |
HS | Mean (SD) | 8.7 (5.3) | 7.9 (3.7) | 11.7 (5.3) | 7.8 (4.2) | < 0.001 |
LSO | 0 (%) | 130 (97.7) | 95 (100.0) | 8 (16.3) | 139 (100.0) | < 0.001 |
2 (%) | 3 (2.3) | 0 (0.0) | 27 (55.1) | 0 (0.0) | ||
3 (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||
4 (%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 13 (26.5) | 0 (0.0) | ||
TFS | Mean (SD) | 4.3 (5.7) | 2.2 (1.8) | 7.6 (8.6) | 4.5 (4.6) | < 0.001 |
LRS | Mean (SD) | 0.9 (0.7) | 0.5 (0.3) | 1.1 (0.8) | 1.9 (1.9) | < 0.001 |
TW | Mean (SD) | 6.3 (4.7) | 3.9 (2.3) | 7.6 (9.2) | 13.2 (16.6) | < 0.001 |
FOR | Mean (SD) | 1.7 (1.7) | 1.1 (1.2) | 3.2 (2.5) | 3.3 (2.7) | < 0.001 |
Experience | Mean (SD) | 14.8 (11.4) | 12.3 (11.3) | 18.0 (12.6) | 12.8 (8.0) | 0.008 |
