Table 4 Demographic and pregnancy-related characteristics predictive of trajectory.

From: A data driven approach to identify trajectories of prenatal alcohol consumption in an Australian population-based cohort of pregnant women

Exposure trajectory

Abstinent

Low discontinued

Moderate discontinued

Low sustained

Moderate sustained

High sustained

N

N

AOR

95% CI

P value

N

AOR

95% CI

p

value

N

AOR

95% CI

P value

N

AOR

95% CI

P value

N

AOR

95% CI

P value

Participants

493

210

   

170

   

190

   

343

   

52

   

Maternal age

 < 30 years

179

70

Ref

73

Ref

42

Ref

96

Ref

9

Ref

30–34 years

184

82

1.20

(0.79–1.81)

0.40

52

0.96

(0.59–1.56)

0.87

94

1.71

(1.07–2.72)

0.02

160

1.63

(1.11–2.40)

0.01

23

2.98

(1.23–7.20)

0.02

 >  = 35 years

130

58

1.35

(0.86–2.12)

0.20

45

1.16

(0.70–1.94)

0.57

54

1.39

(0.83–2.32)

0.21

87

1.13

(0.74–1.74)

0.57

20

3.70

(1.49–9.19)

0.01

Maternal education

Secondary

98

38

Ref

  

32

Ref

  

18

Ref

  

67

Ref

  

11

Ref

  

Trade/Diploma

140

45

0.78

(0.46–1.33)

0.36

69

2.05

(1.16–3.63)

0.01

47

1.92

(1.01–3.66)

0.05

71

0.78

(0.48–1.27)

0.32

12

0.78

(0.31–1.97)

0.60

Tertiary

255

126

1.14

(0.69–1.86)

0.61

69

1.12

(0.61–2.04)

0.72

124

3.00

(1.59–5.64)

 < 0.01

207

1.43

(0.90–2.26)

0.13

29

0.85

(0.35–2.05)

0.72

Household income

 < $40,000

76

31

Ref

  

26

Ref

  

31

Ref

  

25

Ref

  

5

Ref

  

$40–70,000

112

37

0.89

(0.50–1.59)

0.69

19

0.54

(0.26–1.13)

0.10

36

0.80

(0.44–1.46)

0.46

52

2.21

(1.14–4.30)

0.02

4

0.66

(0.16–2.67)

0.56

$70,000-$100,000

125

54

1.06

(0.61–1.85)

0.84

44

1.19

(0.63–2.24)

0.59

40

0.62

(0.34–1.11)

0.11

92

3.00

(1.59–5.68)

 < 0.01

13

1.68

(0.54–5.25)

0.37

 > $100,000

155

80

1.21

(0.70–2.08)

0.50

74

1.81

(0.97–3.37)

0.06

76

0.96

(0.55–1.67)

0.88

162

4.27

(2.28–7.99)

 < 0.001

29

3.27

(1.08–9.84)

0.04

Missing

25

8

0.72

(0.27–1.92)

0.51

7

0.88

(0.30–2.52)

0.81

7

0.65

(0.21–1.96)

0.44

12

2.19

(0.83–5.77)

0.11

1

0.89

(0.09–8.68)

0.92

Caucasian

No

120

47

Ref

  

15

Ref

  

26

Ref

  

17

Ref

  

3

Ref

  

Yes

372

163

1.23

(0.81–1.88)

0.33

155

2.87

(1.52- 5.42)

 < 0.01

164

2.32

(1.40–3.85)

 < 0.01

326

7.13

(3.99–12.73)

 < 0.001

49

4.14

(1.22–14.1)

0.02

Pre-pregnancy BMI

Normal/underweight

287

142

Ref

  

87

Ref

  

120

Ref

  

239

Ref

  

32

Ref

  

Overweight

95

32

0.71

(0.45–1.12)

0.14

44

1.58

(0.99–2.54)

0.06

38

0.91

(0.58–1.45)

0.69

57

0.68

(0.45–1.02)

0.06

13

1.16

(0.55–2.42)

0.70

Obese

93

29

0.62

(0.38–1.01)

0.06

33

0.89

(0.53–1.50)

0.67

24

0.62

(0.37–1.05)

0.07

35

0.36

(0.22–0.58)

 < 0.001

7

0.41

(0.16–1.05)

0.06

Pregnancy planning

No

94

50

1.52

(1.00–2.32)

0.05

66

2.99

(1.92–4.67)

 < 0.001

40

1.39

(0.88–2.22)

0.16

77

1.40

(0.93–2.09

0.10

10

1.06

(0.46–2.43)

0.89

Yes

398

159

Ref

  

104

Ref

  

149

Ref

  

266

Ref

  

42

Ref

  

Primipara

No

259

99

Ref

62

Ref

123

Ref

180

Ref

 

24

Ref

Yes

227

108

1.25

(0.88–1.79)

0.22

106

2.09

(1.38–3.16)

 < 0.01

63

0.61

(0.42–0.91)

0.02

160

0.85

(0.61–1.19)

0.34

28

1.40

(0.73–2.67)

0.31

Smoking in pregnancy

No

429

187

Ref

127

Ref

173

Ref

248

Ref

37

Ref

Yes

63

23

0.87

(0.50–1.54)

0.64

43

1.71

(1.03–2.85)

0.04

17

1.04

(0.55–1.97)

0.90

94

4.05

(2.60–6.31)

 < 0.001

15

4.28

(1.92–9.54)

 < 0.001

  1. N: Sample size for multivariate analysis (i.e. number of cases with a complete set of predictors, except for income, where a ‘missing’ category was included because ~ 4% of missing data).
  2. Ref: Reference category.
  3. AOR (95% CI): Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval adjusted for all predictors shown in table. Control group is abstinence in pregnancy, but not lifetime abstainer. Boldface where a significant difference was found. For predictor variables with more than two categories (maternal age, income, BMI and education), p values from likelihood ratio tests (not shown) were used-evaluate the predictors. Likelihood ratio p values were < 0.01 in all bolded results.