Table 3 Difference of demographic and health condition according to different groups.

From: Effect of noise sensitivity on psychophysiological response through monoscopic 360 video and stereoscopic sound environment experience: a randomized control trial

Methods

Group 1

Group 2

t

P-value

95% CI of the diff

Effect size

Power

Lower

Upper

Gender

Number

Number

      

Male

16

14

      

Female

12

18

      

Year

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

      

Age

24.1 (2.5)

24.6 (2.3)

−0.80

.43

−1.72

0.74

0.21

0.12

Health condition

PHQ

3.4 (3.4)

4.2 (3.0)

−0.96

.34

−2.45

0.87

0.25

0.16

STAI-Y

21.2 (4.7)

19.5 (5.8)

1.20

.24

−1.11

4.41

0.32

0.22

PSS

21.0 (4.0)

22.2 (4.3)

0.26

.26

−3.37

0.94

0.29

0.20

Noise sensitivity

64.5 (8.6)

91.8 (8.4)

−12.45

 < .01

−31.67

−22.89

3.26

1.00

Hyperacusis

7.4 (5.0)

14.9 (5.7)

−5.40

 < .01

−10.35

−4.75

1.42

1.00

Temperament and character dimension

Novelty seeking

58.4 (10.1)

58.7 (10.1)

−0.13

.90

−5.54

4.88

0.03

0.05

Harm Avoidance

46.6 (10.5)

51.9 (13.2)

−1.70

.10

−11.48

0.95

0.45

0.39

Reward dependence

53.7 (13.1)

55.9 (14.8)

−0.60

.55

−9.41

5.09

0.16

0.09

Persistence

53.1 (11.4)

49.9 (9.9)

1.19

.24

−2.23

8.77

0.31

0.22

Self-directiveness

54.1 (10.1)

49.5 (11.9)

1.61

.11

−1.13

10.34

0.42

0.35

Cooperativeness

50.7 (13.2)

49.1 (13.7)

0.46

.64

−5.36

8.59

0.12

0.07

Self-transcendence

46.1 (9.4)

47.4 (9.1)

−0.53

.60

−6.06

3.52

0.14

0.08

Quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF)

Total score

71.0 (8.3)

67.1 (9.2)

1.70

.10

−0.70

8.41

0.45

0.39

Back to article page