Figure 4 | Scientific Reports

Figure 4

From: Dissociated brain functional connectivity of fast versus slow frequencies underlying individual differences in fluid intelligence: a DTI and MEG study

Figure 4The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Segregation coefficient. (A) Segregation coefficient computed from structural and functional connectivity in participants with high Gf. (B) Segregation coefficient computed from structural and functional connectivity in participants with average Gf. (C) Contrasts related to the segregation coefficient between the two groups. In the contrast, the red colour indicates that high versus average Gf individuals had a weaker segregation coefficient among a significantly higher number of ROIs, meaning that they presented more inter-subnetwork connections. Conversely, the blue colour showed that average versus high Gf individuals had a weaker segregation coefficient among a significantly higher number of ROIs, meaning that they presented more inter-subnetwork connections. (D) Segregation coefficient of high, average, and high versus average Gf participants. Here, each dot shows the segregation coefficient of each of the 90 ROIs, independently for high and average Gf participants. Dashed lines indicate the standard deviation with reference to zero, helping to identify whether the ROIs had a stronger or weaker segregation coefficient for high versus average Gf participants.

Back to article page