Table 3 Overall, balanced and class-wise evaluation of time-split experiments with ChEMBL data.
CV | Predict holdout set | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cal_original | Cal_update1 | Cal_update2 | Cal_update1_and_2 | ||
Validity | 0.81 ± 0.01 | 0.57 ± 0.14 | 0.75 ± 0.07 | 0.77 ± 0.09 | 0.78 ± 0.07 |
Efficiency | 0.93 ± 0.04 | 0.82 ± 0.14 | 0.78 ± 0.12 | 0.74 ± 0.13 | 0.73 ± 0.15 |
Accuracy | 0.87 ± 0.04 | 0.68 ± 0.10 | 0.68 ± 0.08 | 0.70 ± 0.10 | 0.70 ± 0.09 |
Balanced validity | 0.81 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.11 | 0.73 ± 0.09 | 0.76 ± 0.08 | 0.77 ± 0.08 |
Balanced efficiency | 0.93 ± 0.04 | 0.83 ± 0.14 | 0.79 ± 0.12 | 0.74 ± 0.13 | 0.73 ± 0.15 |
Balanced accuracy | 0.87 ± 0.04 | 0.65 ± 0.09 | 0.65 ± 0.09 | 0.66 ± 0.10 | 0.67 ± 0.09 |
Validity inactive class | 0.81 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.26 | 0.76 ± 0.22 | 0.78 ± 0.22 | 0.78 ± 0.20 |
Efficiency inactive class | 0.93 ± 0.04 | 0.84 ± 0.14 | 0.79 ± 0.14 | 0.72 ± 0.14 | 0.73 ± 0.16 |
Accuracy inactive class | 0.87 ± 0.05 | 0.72 ± 0.26 | 0.69 ± 0.26 | 0.68 ± 0.29 | 0.70 ± 0.24 |
Validity active class | 0.81 ± 0.01 | 0.50 ± 0.22 | 0.71 ± 0.19 | 0.74 ± 0.18 | 0.75 ± 0.14 |
Efficiency active class | 0.93 ± 0.05 | 0.81 ± 0.14 | 0.78 ± 0.13 | 0.75 ± 0.10 | 0.73 ± 0.16 |
Accuracy active class | 0.87 ± 0.04 | 0.59 ± 0.20 | 0.61 ± 0.26 | 0.64 ± 0.23 | 0.64 ± 0.20 |