Table 1 Clinical and ultrasonic features of the thyroid nodules.

From: Diagnostic value of thyroid imaging reporting and data system combined with BRAFV600E mutation analysis in Bethesda categories III–V thyroid nodules

Variables, n (%)

Benign (n = 74)

Malignant (n = 100)

p*

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

p§

Shape

Wider-than-tall

68 (92)

61 (61)

 < 0.001

1 (reference)

0.002

Taller-than-wide

6 (8)

39 (39)

 

6.117 (1.936,19.322)

 

Echogenicity

Isoechoic/Hyperechoic

4 (5)

10 (10)

0.008

1 (reference)

0.1

Hypoechoic

53 (72)

83 (83)

3.546 (0.548–22.943)

84

Very hypoechoic

17 (23)

7 (7)

1.816 (0.504–6.541)

0.361

Margin

Smooth

46 (62)

21 (21)

 < 0.001

1 (reference)

 

Lobulated or irregular

9 (12)

38 (38)

4.178 (1.511,11.552)

0.006

Ill-defined

19 (26)

41 (41)

2.318 (0.942,5.706)

0.067

Echogenic foci

None

23 (31)

15 (15)

0.016

1 (reference)

 

Punctate echogenic foci

38 (51)

74 (74)

3.05 (1.096–8.490)

0.033

Macrocalcifications

10 (14)

7 (7)

1.736 (0.406–7.429)

0.457

Peripheral calcifications

3 (4)

4 (4)

4.354 (0.557–34.044)

0.161

Acoustis halo

None

62 (84)

96 (96)

0.004

1 (reference)

 

Complete

10 (14)

1 (1)

0.294 (0.03–2.842)

0.290

Interrupted

2 (3)

3 (3)

3.648 (0.403–33.058)

0.250

Blood flow

None

17 (23)

41 (41)

0.029

1 (reference)

 

Hypervascular

30 (41)

26 (26)

0.768 (0.283–2.082)

0.603

Mild/moderate

27 (36)

33 (33)

0.756 (0.305–1.871)

0.545

Posterior echo

None

72 (97)

90 (90)

0.060

 

Attenuation

2 (3)

10 (10)

Composition

Solid

69 (93)

97 (97)

0.287

 

Mixed cystic and solid

5 (7)

3 (3)

Age, years (mean ± SD)

47 ± 14

44 ± 13

0.146

Gender

Male

14 (19)

29 (29)

0.127

 

Female

60 (81)

71 (71)

Diameter, milimeters (mean ± SD)

18 ± 13

12 ± 7

 < 0.001

  1. *By chi-square test.
  2. §By multiple logistic regression analysis.