Table 4 The performance of the P wave detection algorithms on pathological signals from the MITDB with annotations MIT PDB (Se—sensitivity; PP—positive predictivity).
Sig. no | Type of pathology | Basic method26 | Previous method31 | Proposed method | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Se [%] | PP [%] | Se [%] | PP [%] | Se [%] | PP [%] | ||
106 | PVC | 90.98 | 91.83 | 92.77 | 81.09 | 99.37 | 94.75 |
119 | PVC | 99.38 | 99.69 | 97.41 | 98.20 | 98.15 | 97.80 |
207 | NOD | 81.54 | 56.58 | 96.18 | 78.49 | 97.47 | 78.85 |
214 | PVC | 98.55 | 99.5 | 99.75 | 95.32 | 99.90 | 94.45 |
222 | NOD | 82.28 | 54.17 | 62.13 | 89.87 | 81.96 | 84.32 |
223 | PVC | 94.62 | 83.72 | 98.00 | 83.86 | 99.48 | 92.27 |
231 | AVB II | 78.39 | 99.68 | 100.00 | 98.66 | 98.50 | 98.45 |
Mean | 89.39 | 83.59 | 93.88 | 89.31 | 96.40 | 91.56 | |