Table 9 Experimental comparison of each signal decomposition method combined with PNCC (R: recall rate, P: precision).
From: Research on recognition and classification of pulse signal features based on EPNCC
Category project | CEEMD-PNCC | CEEMDAN-PNCC | VMD-PNCC | EEMD-PNCC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R (%) | P (%) | R (%) | P (%) | R (%) | P (%) | R (%) | P (%) | |
CHFpulmonary edema [1 0 0] | 83.3 | 74.8 | 84.4 | 93.1 | 83.3 | 80.0 | 93.8 | 83.3 |
Respiratory failure [0 1 0] | 68.1 | 81.7 | 87.5 | 81.8 | 79.2 | 87.7 | 83.3 | 95.2 |
MIcardiogenic shock [0 0 1] | 83.3 | 82.1 | 95.5 | 90.0 | 83.3 | 79.7 | 86.4 | 90.5 |
Accuracy rate | 78.63 | 88.46 | 82.05 | 88.46 | ||||
