Table 1 Contingency tables.
From: Role of trade agreements in the global cereal market and implications for virtual water flows
t | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
No trade | Trade | Tot rows | ||
No trade agreement | ||||
t-1 | No trade | 94,3% | 1,3% | 95,6% |
Trade | 1,0% | 3,4% | 4,4% | |
Tot columns | 95,3% | 4,7% | 100% | |
Operational activation | ||||
t-1 | No trade | 75,3% | 7,3% | 82,6% |
Trade | 3,2% | 14,2% | 17,4% | |
Tot columns | 78,5% | 21,5% | 100% | |
Trade agreement in t-1 and t | ||||
t-1 | No trade | 66,9% | 4,3% | 71,2% |
Trade | 3,7% | 25,1% | 28,8% | |
Tot columns | 70,6% | 29,4% | 100% | |
