Table 1 Comparison of performance (%) between AM-GCN and other recognition methods.
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ResNet101 | 94.2 | 96.4 | 82.1 | 64.2 | 70.0 | 92.4 | 91.7 | 84.2 | 93.7 | 78.6 | 84.0 | 61.4 | 83.6 | 96.7 | 61.2 | |
SE-ResNet101 | 97.8 | 95.6 | 89.4 | 74.8 | 77.0 | 96.4 | 96.4 | 89.6 | 98.0 | 89.1 | 89.5 | 77.8 | 89.2 | 97.6 | 72.2 | |
ML-GCN | 98.0 | 96.2 | 92.4 | 76.5 | 87.7 | 97.3 | 97.5 | 93.8 | 98.5 | 89.3 | 91.9 | 81.6 | 92.0 | 98.6 | 75.2 | |
ADD-GCN | 96.3 | 98.2 | 94.9 | 80.9 | 85.3 | 97.7 | 98.2 | 95.9 | 98.6 | 92.5 | 93.4 | 84.6 | 95.1 | 99.5 | 78.8 | |
AM-GCN | 99.0 | 98.1 | 95.4 | 81.1 | 85.4 | 97.8 | 98.5 | 96.7 | 97.6 | 94.7 | 93.8 | 84.8 | 96.0 | 98.2 | 79.6 | |