Table 4 HR estimation performance comparison between the proposed method and the FSM method according to the noise type.

From: Real-time realizable mobile imaging photoplethysmography

Noise Types

Proposed

Proposed + FSM

AAE (bpm)

ARE (%)

AAE (bpm)

ARE (%)

VHR (%)

Head movement

2.79 ± 5.17

3.89 ± 7.19

0.56 ± 0.47

0.81 ± 0.67

63.96

Lighting interference

4.11 ± 9.06

5.57 ± 12.19

0.89 ± 1.93

1.26 ± 2.73

72.97

  1. Values are reported as means ± standard deviations.
Back to article page