Figure 3
From: Development of a system for the automated identification of herbarium specimens with high accuracy
(a) A cross-tabulation table was created for the recall and precision values of 17 taxa of Salix L in the third experiment. (1) S. integra Thunb., (2) S. futura Seemen, (3) S. pierotii Miq., (4) S. udensis Trautv. et C.A.Mey., (5) S. miyabeana Seemen subsp. gymnolepis (H.Lév. et Vaniot) H.Ohashi et Yonek., (6) S. vulpina Andersson subsp. vulpina, (7) S. dolichostyla Seemen subsp. serissifolia (Kimura) H.Ohashi et H.Nakai, (8) S. vulpina Andersson subsp. alopochroa (Kimura) H.Ohashi et Yonek., (9) S. eriocataphylla Kimura, (10) S. japonica Thunb., (11) S. dolichostyla Seemen subsp. dolichostyla, (12) S. eriocarpa Franch. et Sav., (13) S. triandra L. subsp. nipponica (Franch. et Sav.) A.K.Skvortsov, (14) S. gracilistyla Miq., (15) S. caprea L., (16) S. chaenomeloides Kimura, (17) S. sieboldiana Blume var. sieboldiana, (18) others. (b) Results of Grad-CAM analysis of Salix integra and Salix futura. Red indicates the more important parts while blue represents less important parts.
