Table 3 The performance of all algorithms.

From: Machine learning to predict end stage kidney disease in chronic kidney disease

 

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Specificity

Precision

F1 Score

AUC

Logistic regression

0.75 (0.72, 0.79)

0.79 (0.73, 0.85)

0.75 (0.71, 0.79)

0.26 (0.24, 0.29)

0.38 (0.36, 0.41)

0.79 (0.77, 0.82)

Naïve Bayes

0.86 (0.85, 0.87)

0.72 (0.68, 0.75)

0.87 (0.86, 0.89)

0.37 (0.35, 0.40)

0.49 (0.46, 0.51)

0.80 (0.77, 0.82)

Random forest

0.82 (0.80, 0.85)

0.76 (0.71, 0.81)

0.83 (0.80, 0.86)

0.34 (0.30, 0.39)

0.46 (0.43, 0.49)

0.81 (0.78, 0.83)

K nearest neighbor

0.84 (0.81, 0.86)

0.60 (0.57, 0.64)

0.86 (0.83, 0.89)

0.35 (0.30, 0.40)

0.43 (0.40, 0.46)

0.73 (0.71, 0.75)

Decision tree

0.84 (0.82, 0.86)

0.44 (0.39, 0.49)

0.89 (0.86, 0.91)

0.33 (0.26, 0.40)

0.35 (0.32, 0.39)

0.66 (0.63, 0.68)

KFRE

0.90 (0.90, 0.91)

0.47 (0.42, 0.52)

0.95 (0.94, 0.96)

0.50 (0.45, 0.55)

0.48 (0.43, 0.52)

0.80 (0.78, 0.83)

  1. All outcomes are expressed as mean and (95% confidence interval).
  2. KFRE kidney failure risk equation, AUC area under the curve.