Table 1 Results of the QLF measurements in different groups: ΔF (fluorescence loss [%]) shows avarage fluorescence loss in a lesion and is related to the loss of mineral content and to lesion depth (SD: standard deviation).

From: Remineralisation capability of silver diamine fluoride in artificial enamel lesions on smooth surfaces using quantitative light-induced fluorescence measurements in-vitro

Time

Group

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

SD

Group comparison

ΔF

T-demin

I: SDF

− 21.3

− 8.1

− 16.65

4.13

p = 0.251

II: Bifluorid 12

− 22.7

− 7.2

− 15.38

4.70

III: Cervitec F

− 23.8

− 10.0

− 17.56

4.16

Negative control

− 19.1

− 10.1

− 13.46

3.89

ΔF T07

I: SDF

− 21.8

− 8.4

− 14.16

3.94

p = 0.075

II: Bifluorid 12

− 30.5

− 10.5

− 17.88

4.89

III: Cervitec F

− 24.1

− 8.1

− 15.88

4.13

ΔF T14

I: SDF

− 23.1

− 8.6

− 15.53

4.42

p = 0.060

II: Bifluorid 12

− 30.9

− 12.6

− 19.40

5.19

III: Cervitec F

− 21.9

− 7.4

− 15.97

4.56

ΔF T21

I: SDF

− 31.3

− 8.6

− 16.17

6.81

p = 0.131

II: Bifluorid 12

− 27.1

− 12.1

− 18.81

4.12

III: Cervitec F

− 22.0

− 8.9

− 15.08

3.81

ΔF T28

I: SDF

− 33.0

− 9.9

− 16.47a

6.08

p = 0.034*

II: Bifluorid 12

− 20.0

− 12.4

− 15.55a,b

2.15

III: Cervitec F

− 22.9

− 6.3

− 11.71b

4.83

Negative control

− 20.2

− 12.6

− 15.40a,b

3.20

  1. *Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between the groups.