Table 1 Summary of the characteristics of the included studies.

From: Effectiveness of interferential current therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Study

N

Selected study arms

Co-intervention

Follow-up

IFC in intervention group

Appraised outcome measure

Protocol

IFC settings

Quirk et al.16

26

(1) Active IFC + exercises

(2) Exercises

Exercise program (twice/d for 4 wk)

3–6 mo

15 min/d

3 d/wk for 4 wk

Pulse frequency: 0–100 Hz for 10 min, 130 Hz for last 5 min

Pulse width and amplitude: N/A

Electrodes: Suction electrodes (placement N/A)

Overall clinical score

Adedoyin et al.17

30

(1) Active IFC + exercises

(2) Sham IFC + exercises

Dietary advice + Exercise program (twice/wk for 4 wk)

At treatment completion

20 min/d

2 d/wk

for 4 wk

Pulse frequency: AMF at 100 Hz for 15 min, 80 Hz for last 5 min

Amplitude: Above sensory threshold

Electrodes: 2 placed at latero-medial region, 2 placed at antero-posterior region

Pain (VAS)

Adedoyin et al.18

31

(1) Active IFC + exercises

(2) Exercises

Exercise program (twice/wk for 4 wk)

At treatment completion

20 min/d

2 d/wk

for 4 wk

Pulse frequency: Continuous 80 Hz

Amplitude: Above sensory threshold with tingling sensation

Electrodes: 2 placed longitudinally at each side of knee

Pain (VAS), function (WOMAC)

Defrin et al.19

54

(1) Active IFC

(2) Sham IFC

Nil

At treatment completion

20 min/d

3 d/wk

for 4 wk

Pulse frequency: Carrier at 4000 Hz and AMF at 30–60 Hz

Amplitude: 30% above (noxious) or 30% below (innocuous) sensory threshold; sensation maintained by raising intensity in adjusted group

Electrodes: 1 placed at lateral side of knee, 1 placed at medial side of knee

Pain (VAS), stiffness (VAS)

Itoh et al.20

24

(1) Active IFC

(2) Control

(3) Active IFC + acupuncture

(4) Acupuncture

Control: Topical poultice if required

Acupuncture: Six acupoints on affected knee (once/wk for 5 wk)

10 wk

15 min/d

1 d/wk

for 5 wk

Pulse frequency: Carrier at 4000 Hz and 4122 Hz, AMF at 122 Hz

Amplitude: 2–3 times above sensory threshold

Electrodes: A 809-mm2 electrode placed at the most tender site, a 5688-mm2 electrode placed at its opposite side

Pain (VAS), function (WOMAC)

Dyson21

24

(1) Active IFC + exercises

(2) Exercises

Exercise program (twice/wk for 3 wk)

At treatment completion

25 min/d

2 d/wk

3 wk

Pulse frequency: Carrier at 3850 Hz and AMF at 80–120 Hz

Electrodes: 4 placed around symptomatic knee

Pain (VAS), function (WOMAC)

Atamaz et al.22

66

(1) Active IFC + exercises

(2) Sham IFC + exercises

Exercise program (3 d/wk for 3 wk)

1, 3, and 6 mo

20 min/d

5 d/wk

3 wk

Pulse frequency: Carrier at 4000 Hz and AMF at 100 Hz

Amplitude: Tactile sensory threshold

Electrodes: 2 placed at knee region

Pain (VAS), function (WOMAC), mobility (15-m walk test)

Gundog et al.23

30

(1) Active IFC

(2) Sham IFC

Nil

1wk

20 min/d

5 d/wk

3 wk

Pulse frequency: Carrier at 4000 Hz and AMF at 100 Hz

Amplitude: Strong but comfortable level

Electrodes: 2 placed laterally on the patella

Pain (VAS), function (WOMAC), mobility (15-m walk test), stiffness (WOMAC)

de Paula Gomes et al.24

40

(1) Active IFC + exercises

(2) Sham IFC + exercises

Exercise program (3 d/wk for 8 wk)

At treatment completion

40 min/d

3 d/wk

8 wk

Pulse frequency: Carrier at 4000 Hz and AMF at 75 Hz

Amplitude: Strong but comfortable level

Electrodes: 4 placed around affected knee

Pain (VAS), function (WOMAC), stiffness (WOMAC)

Alqualo-Costa et al.25

84

(1) Active IFC + sham PBM

(2) Sham IFC + sham PBM

(3) Active IFC + active PBM

(4) Sham IFC + active PBM

PBM: low-level laser, 27 J per session; average power, 40 mW; cross-sectional area, 0.5 cm2

3 and 6 mo

30 min/d

3 d/wk

4 wk

Pulse frequency: Carrier at 4000 Hz and AMF at 50–100 Hz

Amplitude: Strong level that is not painful

Electrodes: 4 placed with quadripolur configuration to cover area of pain

Pain (VAS), function (WOMAC), mobility (timed up and go test)

  1. N number of patients, IFC interferential current therapy, d day, wk week, mo month, min minute, Hz hertz, N/A not applicable, VAS visual analog scale, ROM range of motion, AMF amplitude-modulated frequency, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, PBM Photobiomodulation.
  2. IFC versus Placebo/Sham.
  3. IFC + Other therapy versus other therapy.