Table 5 Comparison of damage caused by pine weevil between treatments at the clear-cut site; the Tukey method was used to compare family estimates.
Contrast | Estimate | SE | 95% CI | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Control–Collar | 0.373 | 0.136 | 0.020 to 0.724 | 0.0097 |
Control–Glue | 0.800 | 0.133 | 0.456 to 1.143 | < 0.0001 |
Control–C wax | 0.143 | 0.135 | − 0.204 to 0.491 | 0.6420 |
Control–F wax | − 0.058 | 0.138 | − 0.415 to 0.300 | 0.9994 |
Collar–Glue | 0.427 | 0.146 | 0.049 to 0.804 | 0.0562 |
Collar–F wax | − 0.229 | 0.144 | − 0.603 to 0.144 | 0.4158 |
Collar–C wax | − 0.431 | 0.148 | − 0.81 to 0.048 | 0.0441 |
Glue–F wax | − 0.656 | 0.142 | − 1.024 to − 0.288 | 0.0001 |
Glue–C wax | − 0.858 | 0.145 | − 1.233 to 0.481 | < 0.0001 |
F wax–C wax | − 0.201 | 0.14 | − 0.563 to 0.161 | 0.8062 |