Table 1 FM100 Indicator scores, with and without filters. Significant main effects and Tukey post-hoc comparisons on filter vs no-filter effects for FM100 indicators.

From: Coloured filters can simulate colour deficiency in normal vision but cannot compensate for congenital colour vision deficiency

 

Variantor

CVN (n = 5)

F test

EnChroma

CVN (n = 10)a

EnChroma

CVD (n = 16)a

No filter

Variantor

Significance level

No filter

EnChroma

No filter

EnChroma

TES

68.00 ± 40.22

210.00 ± 30.62

F(1,2) = 55.40,* η2 = 0.97, P = 0.018

31.00 ± 12.24

44.13 ± 11.19

140.85 ± 9.97

125.77 ± 9.11

SQR

7.34 ± 2.55

14.40 ± 1.08

F(1,2) = 20.31*, η2 = 0.91, P = 0.046

5.34 ± 0.66

6.58 ± 0.64

11.66 ± 0.53

11.04 ± 0.50

C-index

1.49 ± 0.29

2.67 ± 0.15

F(1,2) = 29.45*, η2 = 0.94, P = 0.032

1.20 ± 0.10

1.36 ± 0.09

2.10 ± 0.08

2.00 ± 0.08

Angle

57.41 ± 3.80

29.32 ± 3.75

P = 0.055 (n.s.)

58.21 ± 3.44

55.32 ± 6.80

23.16 ± 3.64

36.44 ± 4.73

S-index

1.42 ± 0.06

1.74 ± 0.13

P = 0.226 (n.s.)

1.28 ± 0.03

1.39 ± 0.03

1.50 ± 0.04

1.50 ± 0.03

Time (s)

443.33 ± 97.68

491.83 ± 23.65

P = 0.647 (n.s.)

452.80 ± 38.20

441.95 ± 34.57

365.50 ± 36.91

370.46 ± 38.80

  1. Exact P-values and n.s. (not significant) indicate statistical significance levels of main ANOVA.
  2. aNo significant differences found for EnChroma filters (vs no-filters) using Tukey post-hoc comparisons for CVN or CVD groups.
Back to article page