Table 7 The performance evaluation of the proposed features based on PyFeat with AB compared with other techniques: five numerical representations, RFF, Pse-in-One2.0, iLearn, and SubFeat with 10-fold cross-validation based on the lncRNA dataset. Significant values are in bold.

From: Predicting Parkinson disease related genes based on PyFeat and gradient boosted decision tree

Metric

ACC (%)

AUC (%)

AUPR (%)

F1-score (%)

MCC

SEN (%)

SPC (%)

Binary

60.4

64.9

66.2

60.1

0.209

60.1

60.7

Integer

61.8

64.4

67.9

59.6

0.237

57.9

65.6

Real

59.3

61.4

65.3

59.3

0.190

60.1

58.5

Z-curve

60.4

63.8

66.8

59.2

0.214

58.5

62.3

EIIP

60.1

63.1

66.7

60.2

0.206

60.7

59.6

RFF

67.5

67.4

64.0

66.5

0355

65.4

69.2

Pse-in-One2.0

65.5

64.2

63.7

65.6

0.316

66.5

64.7

iLearn

59.4

64.8

67.5

61.2

0.193

64.4

54.2

SubFeat

63.6

66.7

67.7

63.5

0.278

64.5

62.6

Proposed features

77.8

84.1

84.5

77.4

0.560

77.3

78.3