Table 3 Association between clinicopathological factors and EC prognosis.

From: The relationship between P16INK4A and TP53 promoter methylation and the risk and prognosis in patients with oesophageal cancer in Thailand

Variable

Cases (% )

Median survival (Months)

(95% CI)

Crude HR

(95% CI)

p-value

Adjust HR (95% CI)

p-value

Region of cancer (Typical oesophagostomy)

Upper site

5 (4.7%)

12.8 (9.23–16.36)

1.00

 

1.00

 

Middle site

73(69.5%)

8.7 (7.13–10.26)

0.54 (0.18–1.59)

0.308

0.27 (0.08–1.18)

0.291

Lower site

27(25.7%)

5.4 (0.40–10.39)

0.58 (0.21–1.62)

0.271

0.31 (0.11–1.78)

0.286

Histology type

Adenocarcinoma

28 (26.7%)

7.3 (3.91–10.69)

1.00

0.785

1.00

0.696

Squamous cell carcinoma

77 (73.3%)

8.8 (5.99–11.61)

1.06 (0.66–1.71)

 

1.10 (0.67–1.81)

 

Histology grading (Goseki classification)

Group I,II (well or moderate differentiation)

33 (31.4%)

12.8 (5.96–19.63)

1.00

0.637

1.00

0.048

Group III,IV (poor differentiation)

72 (68.6%)

8.7 (6.13–11.26)

1.15 (0.69–1.92)

 

1.22 (1.09–2.82)

 

Stage of disease (TNM classification)

Stage I (IA,IB)

10 (9.5%)

39.9 (3.32–74.88)

1.00

 

1.00

 

Stage II

17 (16.2%)

20.7 (7.57–33.83)

1.31 (0.49–3.44)

0.589

0.74 (0.24–3.01)

0.604

Stage III (IIIA , IIIB)

21 (22.9%)

8.6 (7.26–9.93)

1.48 (1.57–5.43)

0.038

1.25 (1.44–3.42)

0.046

Stage IV

57 (51.4%)

6.1 (4.42–7.78)

2.71 (1.16–6.36)

0.022

2.68 (1.04–6.93)

0.041

Metastasis

No

35 (33.3%)

12.0 (7.22–16.77)

1.00

0.009

1.00

0.013

Yes

70 (66.7%)

7.1 (3.50–10.69)

1.81 (1.17–2.88)

 

1.52 (1.21–2.48)

 

Complication

No

71 (67.6%)

8.9 (4.81–12.31)

1.00

0.804

1.00

0.875

Yes

34 (32.4%)

8.1 (7.22–16.77)

0.94 (0.61–1.47)

 

0.96 (0.59–1.56)

 
  1. Oesophageal cancer (95% CI): 95% confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, adjust for age, gender, BMI and comorbidity by using Cox proportional hazards regression models. p-value from partial likelihood ratio test.