Table 4 Comparison of the performance of the proposed MTM with some other existing works.
Reference | Year | Physical, Electrical dimension (mm × mm, λ × λ) | Resonance frequency (GHz) | Covering bands | EMR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | 5 × 5 0.23λ × 0.23λ | 13.9, 27.5 | Ku, K | 4.4 | |
2020 | 9 × 9 0.124λ × 0.124λ | 14.93, 10.84, 4.15 | C, X, Ku | 8.03 | |
2017 | 25 × 25 0.23λ × 0.23λ | 2.8 | S | 4.28 | |
2021 | 10 × 10 0.14λ × 0.14λ | 4.2, 10.14, 13.15, 17.1 | C, X, Ku | 7.17 | |
2020 | 10.16 × 22.86 0.32λ × 0.72λ | 9.4 | X | 1.4 | |
2021 | 8 × 8 0.23 λ × 0.23 λ | 8.67, 13.84 | X, Ku | 4.3 | |
2018 | 6 × 4 0.1 λ × 0.07 λ | 5.4, 6.2 | C | 9.3 | |
2019 | 20 × 20 0.16 λ × 0.16 λ | 2.4, 3.9, 5.2 | S, C | 6.25 | |
2020 | 6 × 5 0.8λ × 0.67λ | 40 | Ka | 1.25 | |
2018 | 20 × 20 0.77λ × 0.77λ | 11.5, 13.5 | X, Ku | 1.4 | |
Proposed | 2021 | 20 × 20 0.13 λ × 0.13 λ | 1.98, 3.67, 4.74, 8.38, 10.8 | L, S, C, X | 7.57 |
