Table 4 The sensitivity and specificity of Meary angle and calcaneal pitch.

From: Deep learning-based tool affects reproducibility of pes planus radiographic assessment

 

Meary angle

Calcaneal pitch

Without algorithm

With algorithm

Comparison

p-value

Without algorithm

With algorithm

Comparison

p-value

Sensitivity

Reader1

100.00 (100.00–100.00)

95.24 (88.80–100.00)

0.1468

95.31 (90.13–100.00)

96.88 (92.61–100.00)

0.3041

Reader2

73.81 (60.51–87.11)

85.71 (75.13–96.30)

0.0538

100.00 (100.00–100.00)

96.88 (92.61–100.00)

0.1452

Reader3

97.62 (93.01–100.00)

90.48 (81.60–99.35)

0.1752

98.44 (95.40–100.00)

96.88 (92.61–100.00)

0.3128

Reader1 + 2 + 3

90.48 (85.35–95.60)

90.48 (85.35–95.60)

 > 0.9999

97.92 (95.90–99.94)

96.88 (94.41–99.34)

0.3957

Specificity

Reader1

77.36 (66.09–88.63)

84.91 (75.27–94.54)

0.0386

93.55 (84.90–100.00)

96.77 (90.55–100.00)

0.3259

Reader2

96.23 (91.10–100.00)

92.45 (85.34–99.56)

0.3241

93.55 (84.90–100.00)

96.77 (90.55–100.00)

0.2882

Reader3

83.02 (72.91–93.13)

92.45 (85.34–99.56)

0.0597

93.55 (84.90–100.00)

96.77 (90.55–100.00)

0.3259

Reader1 + 2 + 3

85.53 (80.07–91.00)

89.94 (85.26–94.61)

0.0892

93.55 (88.56–98.54)

96.77 (93.18–100.00)

0.176

ACC

Reader1

87.37 (80.69–94.05)

89.47 (83.30–95.65)

0.3977

94.74 (90.25–99.23)

96.84 (93.33–100.00)

0.1617

Reader2

86.32 (79.40–93.23)

89.47 (83.30–95.65)

0.3731

97.89 (95.01–100.00)

96.84 (93.33–100.00)

0.5437

Reader3

89.47 (83.30–95.65)

91.58 (85.99–97.16)

0.5731

96.84 (93.33–100.00)

96.84 (93.33–100.00)

 > 0.9999

Reader1 + 2 + 3

87.72 (83.91–91.53)

90.18 (86.72–93.63)

0.2534

96.49 (94.35–98.63)

96.84 (94.81–98.87)

0.757