Table 2 Coefficient of determination, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and associated 95% confidence intervals between 2 and 3D analysis.

From: An evaluation of temporal and club angle parameters during golf swings using low cost video analyses packages

Product comparison

Phases of the golf swing

Address

Top of backswing

Acceleration

Impact

Follow through (late)

r2

r

P

95% CI

r2

r

P

95% CI

r2

r

P

95% CI

r2

r

P

95% CI

r2

r

P

95% CI

Kinovea vs Pro

0.867

0.931

0.347

− 0.236, 1.153

0.997

0.998

0.363

− 0.541, 2.570

0.912

0.955

0.010 *

0.306, 2.411

0.648

0.805

1.000

− 1.220, 0.970

0.994

0.997

1.000

− 3.585, 3.030

Kinovea vs Live

0.817

0.904

1.000

− 0.849, 0.699

0.888

0.942

1.000

− 7.787, 10.266

0.731

0.855

0.103

− 0.173, 2.556

0.717

0.847

1.000

− 1.161, 0.794

0.995

0.997

1.000

− 1.583, 4.145

Pro vs Live

0.606

0.778

0.901

− 1.639, 0.573

0.898

0.948

1.000

− 8.449, 8.899

0.761

0.872

1.000

− 1.886, 1.553

0.716

0.846

1.000

− 1.027, 0.910

0.993

0.996

1.000

− 1.986, 5.103

Vicon vs Kinovea

0.977

0.988

1.000

− 0.449, 0.199

0.985

0.992

1.000

− 3.933, 2.454

0.958

0.979

0.004 *

− 1.438, − 0.279

0.898

0.948

1.000

− 0.505, 0.705

0.999

0.999

1.000

− 2.024, 1.362

Vicon vs Pro

0.876

0.936

0.441

− 0.207, 0.874

0.989

0.994

1.000

− 2.581, 3.131

0.952

0.976

0.477

− 0.330, 1.330

0.847

0.920

1.000

− 0.631, 0.581

0.998

0.999

1.000

− 2.691, 1.475

Vicon vs Live

0.889

0.943

1.000

− 0.812, 0.412

0.952

0.976

1.000

− 5.390, 6.390

0.878

0.937

1.000

− 0.642, 1.309

0.915

0.957

1.000

− 0.630, 0.464

0.998

0.999

0.749

− 0.884, 2.784

  1. Statistical significance level set to P = 0.05.