Table 4 The impact of \({R}_{0}\), \(S\), \({R}_{d}\) and \({P}_{r}\) on the SFC and Nusselt number for suction and injection case for \(\beta =0.2, m=1, Ha=1, {\phi }_{1}={\phi }_{2}={\phi }_{3}=0.02\).
\({R}_{0}\) | \(S\) | \({R}_{d}\) | \({P}_{r}\) | \({C}_{f-1}\) for suction case (\({R}_{e}=-0.5\)) | \({N}_{u} \left |_{\eta =-1}\right.\) for suction case \(({R}_{e}=-0.5)\) | \({C}_{f-1}\) for injection case \(({R}_{e}=0.5)\) | \({N}_{u} \left | _{\eta =-1}\right.\) for injection case \(({R}_{e}=0.5)\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3 | 1 | 6.2 | 26.6857 | 1.3614 | 26.8082 | 4.0747 |
2 | Â | Â | Â | 25.9166 | 1.3468 | 26.0394 | 4.1195 |
3 | Â | Â | Â | 25.3150 | 1.3328 | 25.4620 | 4.630 |
4 | Â | Â | Â | 4.8833 | 1.3195 | 25.0781 | 4.2049 |
1 | 3 | Â | Â | 26.6857 | 1.3614 | 26.8082 | 4.0747 |
| Â | 5.7 | Â | Â | 26.6857 | 1.9644 | 26.8082 | 5.2233 |
| Â | 16.2 | Â | Â | 26.6857 | 6.0947 | 26.8082 | 10.7574 |
| Â | 3 | 0.5 | Â | 26.6857 | 0.9159 | 26.8082 | 4.2735 |
| Â | Â | 1 | Â | 26.6857 | 1.3614 | 26.8082 | 4.0747 |
| Â | Â | 1.5 | Â | 26.6857 | 1.8025 | 26.8082 | 4.2096 |
| Â | Â | 2 | Â | 26.6857 | 2.2419 | 26.8082 | 4.4733 |
| Â | Â | Â | 4.5 | 26.6857 | 1.4057 | 26.8082 | 3.2059 |
| Â | Â | Â | 5.5 | 26.6857 | 1.3795 | 26.8082 | 3.7016 |
| Â | Â | Â | 6.2 | 26.6857 | 1.3614 | 26.8082 | 4.0747 |
