Table 5 The impact of \({R}_{e}\), \(\beta\), Ha, \({\upphi }_{1}\),\({\upphi }_{2}\), and \({\upphi }_{3}\) on the SFC and Nusselt number for contraction and expansion case, for \({R}_{0}=1, S=3, {R}_{d}=1, {N}_{1}=1.\)
\({R}_{e}\) | \(\beta\) | Ha | \({\phi }_{1}={\phi }_{2}={\phi }_{3}\) | \({C}_{f-1}\) for contraction case \((\alpha =-0.5)\) | \({N}_{u} \left |_{\eta =-1}\right.\) for contraction case \((\alpha =-0.5)\) | \({C}_{f-1}\) for expansion case \((\alpha =0.5)\) | \({N}_{u} \left |_{\eta =-1}\right.\) for expansion case \((\alpha =0.5)\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
− 2 | 0.2 | 1 | 2% | 6.6282 | 0.1502 | 6.3339 | 0.0390 |
− 0.5 |  |  |  | 26.6857 | 1.3614 | 25.4620 | 0.4405 |
0.5 | Â | Â | Â | 26.8082 | 4.0747 | 25.5529 | 1.7113 |
2 | Â | Â | Â | 6.7513 | 11.2320 | 6.4257 | 6.9557 |
− 0.5 | 0.2 |  |  | 26.6857 | 1.3614 | 25.4620 | 0.4405 |
| Â | 0.4 | Â | Â | 15.716 | 1.3505 | 14.5098 | 0.4361 |
| Â | 0.7 | Â | Â | 11.0645 | 1.3398 | 9.8495 | 0.4316 |
| Â | 1 | Â | Â | 9.2097 | 1.3328 | 8.0018 | 0.4286 |
| Â | Â | 2 | Â | 26.6029 | 1.3587 | 25.3802 | 0.4397 |
| Â | Â | 4 | Â | 26.4289 | 1.3537 | 25.2070 | 0.4380 |
| Â | Â | 6 | Â | 26.2456 | 1.3488 | 25.0236 | 0.4365 |
− 0.5 | 0.2 | 1 | 3% | 23.0584 | 1.4021 | 21.9994 | 0.4669 |
| Â | Â | Â | 4% | 19.8505 | 1.4434 | 18.9455 | 0.4945 |
| Â | Â | Â | 5% | 17.0228 | 1.4854 | 16.2587 | 0.5232 |
| Â | Â | Â | 6% | 14.5389 | 1.5279 | 13.9013 | 0.5531 |