Table 1 p-ERG acuities calculated during both recording sessions and corresponding regression line formulas.
From: The p-ERG spatial acuity in the biomedical pig under physiological conditions
Animal | I Session | II Session | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regression line | p-ERG acuity (cpd) | noise (µV) | Regression line | p-ERG acuity (cpd) | noise (µV) | |
1 | Y = − 2.316ln(x) + 5.3051 | 6.1 | 1.1 | Y = − 2.755ln(x) + 6.2595 | 6.6 | 1.1 |
2 | Y = − 1.808ln(x) + 4.0071 | 5.5 | 0.9 | / | / | / |
3 | Y = − 1.392ln(x) + 2.9818 | 5.5 | 0.6 | Y = − 2.822ln(x) + 5.9352 | 5.7 | 1 |
4 | Y = − 3.234ln(x) + 6.824 | 5.8 | 1.1 | Y = − 5.252ln(x) + 10.862 | 6.2 | 1.2 |
5 | Y = − 2.035ln(x) + 4.3921 | 5.5 | 0.9 | Y = − 6.659ln(x) + 13.094 | 6.1 | 1 |
6 | Y = − 1.333ln(x) + 3.4481 | 5.9 | 1.1 | Y = − 2.116ln(x) + 4.841 | 6.3 | 0.9 |
Mean ± SEM | 5.7 ± 0.14 | 1 ± 0.08 | Mean ± SEM | 6.2 ± 0.15 | 1 ± 0.04 | |
