Table 1 Estimated QTL models: effect and localization.
From: Salt tolerance QTLs of an endemic rice landrace, Horkuch at seedling and reproductive stages
Phenotypes | QTL model | Chromosome | Position | LOD | Lower CI | Upper CI | %Variance | %Variance (QTLa Cyto) | Positive allele |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SL | qSL.1@183 | 1 | 183.00 | 13.42 | 175.11 | 190.57 | 20.4 | NA | Horkuch |
SL | qSL.3@218 | 3 | 218.00 | 4.82 | 212.12 | 236.45 | 7.3 | NA | Horkuch |
SL | qSL.5@160 | 5 | 160.43 | 3.83 | 102.86 | 170.27 | 5.5 | NA | Horkuch |
RL | qRL.2@167 | 2 | 167.00 | 10.67 | 161.14 | 176.67 | 20.0 | NA | Horkuch |
TK | qTK.2@45 *Cyto | 2 | 45.00 | 6.11 | 24.05 | 66.99 | 2.42 | 2.3 | Horkucha |
TK | qTK.3@204 *Cyto | 3 | 203.78 | 6.46 | 194.44 | 209.29 | 3.8 | 3.8 | Horkucha |
PH | qPH.1@215 | 1 | 215.00 | 5.59 | 175.11 | 222.54 | 11.4 | NA | Horkuch |
PH | qPH.3@211 | 3 | 211.02 | 5.15 | 203.78 | 272.38 | 7.2 | NA | Horkuch |
PH | qPH.5@144 *Cyto | 5 | 144.00 | 6.64 | 124.73 | 170.27 | 11.0 | 2.1 | Horkucha |
ET | qET.7@97 *Cyto | 7 | 97.00 | 5.82 | 85.83 | 104.41 | 17.7 | 5.5 | Horkuch |
FGN | qFGN.10@58 *Cyto | 10 | 58.48 | 7.72 | 50.30 | 107.07 | 14.9 | 7.5 | IR29 |
FGW | qFGW.10@58 *Cyto | 10 | 58.48 | 9.13 | 50.30 | 107.07 | 17.6 | 9.1 | IR29 |
SF | qSF.10@59 *Cyto | 10 | 59.00 | 7.71 | 50.30 | 107.07 | 17.0 | 12.4 | IR29 |
HI | qHI.10@104 + Cyto | 10 | 103.75 | 8.48 | 50.30 | 107.07 | 15.4 | 1.4 | IR29 |
