Table 1 Comparison of the results.
Method | Scores S, cosine similarities C | Ranking |
|---|---|---|
Lu and Ye 44 | \(S(d_{1} ) = 0.454057\), \(S(d_{2} ) = 0.624296\), \(S(d_{3} ) = 0.458387\), \(S(d_{4} ) = 0.582653\), \(S(d_{5} ) = 0.592526\) | \({F}_{2}>{F}_{5}>{F}_{4}>{F}_{3}>{F}_{1}\) |
Tan et al., 45 | \(S(d_{1} ) = - 0.28165\), \(S(d_{2} ) = 0.61758\), \(S(d_{3} ) = - 0.25181\), \(S(d_{4} ) = 0.379552\), \(S(d_{5} ) = 0.400404\) | \({F}_{2}>{F}_{5}>{F}_{4}>{F}_{3}>{F}_{1}\) |
Ye 43 | \(C(d_{1} ) = 0.495585\), \(C(d_{2} ) = 0.948553\), \(C(d_{3} ) = 0.514484\), \(C(d_{4} ) = 0.867698\), \(C(d_{5} ) = 0.87221\) | \({F}_{2}>{F}_{5}>{F}_{4}>{F}_{3}>{F}_{1}\) |
Current study | \(S(d_{1} ) = 0.176782\), \(S(d_{2} ) = 0.694794\), \(S(d_{3} ) = 0.19038\), \(S(d_{4} ) = 0.523417\), \(S(d_{5} ) = 0.537091\) | \({F}_{2}>{F}_{5}>{F}_{4}>{F}_{3}>{F}_{1}\) |
