Table 4 Analysis of parameters based quantitative cycling points (CP) for 10 candidate RGs in LAC.
| Â | GAPDH | ACTB | RPS9 | EEF1A1 | RPS15 | RPS23 | UXT | RPL4 | B2M | HPRT1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
geo Mean [CP] | 22.170 | 23.810 | 20.460 | 17.420 | 19.510 | 14.410 | 24.630 | 20.120 | 18.550 | 28.860 |
AR Mean [CP] | 22.170 | 23.830 | 20.480 | 17.440 | 19.510 | 14.420 | 24.640 | 20.130 | 18.560 | 28.870 |
min [CP] | 21.870 | 22.640 | 19.870 | 16.900 | 19.210 | 13.940 | 23.860 | 19.610 | 17.740 | 27.950 |
max [CP] | 22.530 | 24.900 | 22.400 | 18.810 | 19.790 | 15.930 | 26.070 | 21.560 | 19.360 | 30.180 |
std dev [+/− CP] | 0.16 | 0.81 | 0.64 | 0.46 | 0.12 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.39 | 0.71 |
CV [% CP] | 0.740 | 3.410 | 3.130 | 2.630 | 0.630 | 3.490 | 1.980 | 2.390 | 2.110 | 2.470 |
min [x-fold] | − 1.230 | − 2.250 | − 1.500 | − 1.440 | − 1.230 | − 1.380 | − 1.710 | − 1.430 | − 1.750 | − 1.870 |
max [x-fold] | 1.280 | 2.130 | 3.840 | 2.610 | 1.210 | 2.880 | 2.710 | 2.710 | 1.750 | 2.500 |
std dev [+/− x-fold] | 1.120 | 1.760 | 1.560 | 1.370 | 1.090 | 1.420 | 1.400 | 1.400 | 1.310 | 1.640 |