Table 4 Comparison of different classification algorithms in both men and women to predict healthy individuals, and individuals with osteopenia and OP.
Models | AUROC | Accuracy | Precision | Sensitivity | specificity | F-score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Men | DT | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.70 | 0.86 | 0.71 |
RF | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.89 | 0.79 | |
KNN | 0.86 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.69 | |
SVM | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.64 | 0.82 | 0.65 | |
GB | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.88 | 0.77 | |
ET | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.70 | 0.86 | 0.73 | |
AB | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.70 | 0.86 | 0.71 | |
ANN | 0.90 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.81 | 0.65 | |
Women | DT | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.90 |
RF | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 0.91 | |
KNN | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.77 | |
SVM | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.79 | |
GB | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.92 | |
ET | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.90 | |
AB | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.90 | |
ANN | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.76 |