Table 7 Comparison of predictions of classification algorithms to recommend sports protocols between men and women groups.
Models | AUROC | Accuracy | Precision | Sensitivity | specificity | F-score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Men | DT | 0.86 | 0.78 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.96 | 0.52 |
RF | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.97 | 0.64 | |
KNN | 0.81 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.90 | 0.46 | |
SVM | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.94 | 0.52 | |
GB | 0.95 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 0.70 | |
ET | 0.94 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.96 | 0.67 | |
AB | 0.96 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.96 | 0.67 | |
ANN | 0.88 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.94 | 0.56 | |
Women | DT | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 0.87 |
RF | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.98 | |
KNN | 0.86 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.92 | 0.48 | |
SVM | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.95 | 0.58 | |
GB | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.94 | |
ET | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.90 | |
AB | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.92 | |
ANN | 0.89 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.37 | 0.89 | 0.34 |