Table 2 DCT and GAT (corrected with different formulas) difference in mmHg.

From: Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations

 

Mean ± SD

p

DCT-GATuncorrected

2.11 ± 2.24

p < 0.001

(5)DCT-GATŚródka

1.86 ± 2.48

p < 0.001

(1)DCT-GATShimmyo

1.97 ± 2.62

p < 0.001

(9)DCT-GATKohlhaas

1.98 ± 2.46

p < 0.001

(2)DCT-GATShimmyoR

2.02 ± 2.80

p < 0.001

(7)DCT-GATDoughty

2.22 ± 2.52

p < 0.001

(3)DCT-GATElsheik2011

3.13 ± 2.36

p < 0.001

(10)DCT-GATEhlers

4.13 ± 2.95

p < 0.001

(4)DCT-GATElsheik2009

4.27 ± 2.65

p < 0.001

(6)DCT-GATChihara

− 2.04 ± 2.24

p < 0.001

(8)DCT-GATFoster

− 4.63 ± 2.30

p < 0.001

  1. DCT Dynamic contour tonometry, GAT Goldmann applanation tonometry, SD Standard deviation, p Level of significance according to paired T-test.
Back to article page