Table 3 DCT and GAT (corrected with different formulas) differences expressed in absolute value in mmHg.

From: Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations

 

Mean |DCT-GAT| in mmHg ± SD

P value

DCT-GATuncorrected

2.43 ± 1.89

p < 0.001

(5)DCT-GAT Śródka

2.40 ± 1.95

p < 0.001

(9)DCT-GATKohlhaas

2.51 ± 1.92

p < 0.001

(6)DCT-GATChihara

2.56 ± 1.62

p < 0.001

(1)DCT-GATShimmyo

2.61 ± 1.97

p < 0.001

(7)DCT-GATDoughty

2.68 ± 2.02

p < 0.001

(2)DCT-GATShimmyoR

2.76 ± 2.07

p < 0.001

(3)DCT-GATElsheik2011

3.29 ± 2.13

p < 0.001

(10)DCT-GATEhlers

4.29 ± 2.70

p < 0.001

(4)DCT-GATElsheik2009

4.32 ± 2.58

p < 0.001

(8)DCT-GATFoster

4.69 ± 2.16

p < 0.001

  1. DCT Dynamic contour tonometry, GAT Goldmann applanation tonometry, SD Standard deviation, p Level of significance according to paired T-test.
Back to article page