Table 4 Results provided by different authors and by the current study after the application of equations correction.
From: Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations
Author | n° eyes | Glaucoma | Chihara (6) | Ehlers (10) | Elsheikh 2009 (3) | Elsheikh 2011 (4) | Kohlhaas (9) | Srodka (5) | Doughty and Zaman (7) | Foster (8) | Shimmyo (1) | ShimmyoR (2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asejczyk-Widlika et al.25 | 108 | A 19 < P < 20 | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | ||||
B 21 < P < 29 | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | ||||||
C 30 < P < 42 | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | |||||
Ghee et al.24 | 135 65 | Glaucoma suspect | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |||||
Glaucoma group | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | |||||||
Wachtl et al.26 | 105 | Glaucoma subjects | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ||||||
Current study | 112 | No | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
